Votes: 0
In defense, Hugo Guillamón Sanmartín has been a rock with a rating of 6.60. His defensive prowess and ability to initiate plays from the back have been vital for a side that has struggled to keep a positive goal difference.
Sergi Canós Tenés, another key midfielder for Valencia, has been impressive with a rating of 6.78. His willingness to take on defenders and get shots on target will be essential if Valencia aims to break through Athletic Club's defense.
Athletic Club, on the other hand, boasts their own set of key players. Midfielder Unai Gómez Etxebarria has been a steady presence in the midfield with a rating of 6.49. Though his stats may not be flashy, his role in maintaining possession and transitioning play cannot be understated.
Daniel García Carrillo has been another central figure for Athletic Club, holding a rating of 6.50. His contributions in midfield may not always make the highlight reels, but his work rate and distribution have been essential to his team's success.
Lastly, attacker Asier Villalibre Molina stands out with a rating of 6.66, combining his goal-scoring ability with a knack for creating chances for his teammates. His performance could be a deciding factor in the upcoming match.
Athletic Club, sitting comfortably at 3rd with 38 points, is in a much more enviable position. Their recent form reads like a dream for any manager (WWWDW), showcasing their ability to not only win but maintain an unbeaten streak. Their pursuit of Champions League football is well on course, and a win in Valencia would further cement their status among the top contenders.
The absence of a clear prediction from the data suggests that the match could go either way, but considering Athletic Club's recent performances, they might just have the upper hand. Expect a tight contest with both teams scoring, but with Athletic Club likely edging out Valencia in a thrilling encounter. The key battles will be in the midfield, and players like Francisco Pérez Martínez and Asier Villalibre Molina could be the deciding factors in their respective teams' fortunes.
20/01 | ![]() |
1 - 0 | ![]() |
29/10 | ![]() |
2 - 2 | ![]() |
11/02 | ![]() |
1 - 2 | ![]() |
26/01 | ![]() |
1 - 3 | ![]() |
21/08 | ![]() |
1 - 0 | ![]() |
Rank | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
30 | 23 | 6 | 1 | 66 | 20 | 46 | 75 |
2 |
![]() |
30 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 61 | 34 | 27 | 67 |
3 |
![]() |
30 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 62 | 36 | 26 | 65 |
4 |
![]() |
30 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 50 | 28 | 22 | 56 |
5 |
![]() |
29 | 17 | 4 | 8 | 54 | 34 | 20 | 55 |
6 |
![]() |
30 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 43 | 31 | 12 | 49 |
7 |
![]() |
30 | 10 | 12 | 8 | 36 | 36 | 0 | 42 |
8 |
![]() |
29 | 11 | 8 | 10 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 41 |
9 |
![]() |
30 | 11 | 6 | 13 | 36 | 43 | -7 | 39 |
10 |
![]() |
29 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 47 | 51 | -4 | 38 |
11 |
![]() |
30 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 37 | 43 | -6 | 38 |
12 |
![]() |
30 | 10 | 7 | 13 | 29 | 33 | -4 | 37 |
13 |
![]() |
30 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 26 | 36 | -10 | 32 |
14 |
![]() |
30 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 37 | 44 | -7 | 31 |
15 |
![]() |
30 | 6 | 13 | 11 | 25 | 35 | -10 | 31 |
16 |
![]() |
30 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 25 | 38 | -13 | 30 |
17 |
![]() |
30 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 32 | 44 | -12 | 28 |
18 |
![]() |
30 | 4 | 13 | 13 | 21 | 40 | -19 | 25 |
19 |
![]() |
29 | 2 | 8 | 19 | 30 | 59 | -29 | 14 |
20 |
![]() |
30 | 1 | 10 | 19 | 28 | 60 | -32 | 13 |